Lithium-ion and flow batteries have complementary strengths: Li-ion excels at high power and fast response, while flow batteries scale energy more cheaply and handle many cycles with low degradation. Hybrid plants that combine both can improve economics and resilience, but they require sophisticated control and commercial structures.
- Li-ion is typically used for short-duration, high-power services (ramping, FFR, intraday arbitrage), while flow batteries provide longer-duration energy shifting.
- Hybrid configurations can reduce equivalent full cycles on Li-ion, extending life and deferring replacements.
- Site-level LCOS can be lower than either technology alone, especially where multiple markets are stacked.
- Success depends on a capable EMS, clear control priorities, and contracts that recognize multi-asset behaviour.
1. Why combine lithium-ion and flow batteries?
In many systems, short-duration and long-duration needs coexist. Building a single technology asset to cover both can be suboptimal. Instead, hybrid plants co-locate:
- A Li-ion block sized for power and fast response.
- A flow battery block sized for extended duration.
This allows the plant to participate in multiple markets: fast frequency response, intraday arbitrage, capacity, and congestion management, while optimizing cycling across assets.
2. Technical benchmarks: example hybrid configurations
The table below shows indicative parameters for a hybrid plant and its components:
| Component | Power (MW) | Energy (MWh) | Typical role |
|---|---|---|---|
| Li-ion block | 50 | 100 (2h) | Ramping, FFR, intraday arbitrage |
| Flow battery block | 30 | 300 (10h) | Load shifting, capacity, congestion relief |
| Hybrid plant (combined) | 80 (some shared BoP) | 400 | Multi-service LDES |
Variants include separate inverters for each technology, shared inverters with DC coupling, and more complex DC bus topologies. Each has implications for losses, CAPEX, and control flexibility.
3. Economics: LCOS and value stacking for hybrid plants
The economics of hybrid plants hinge on:
- Blended CAPEX: the weighted average cost per kWh of storage and per kW of power across both technologies.
- Stacking value: the ability to earn revenue from multiple markets simultaneously (frequency response, arbitrage, capacity).
- Cycle optimization: reducing equivalent full cycles on the Li-ion block, extending its life and deferring replacement.
- Market structure: whether contracts and settlement rules allow multi-asset dispatch and value attribution.
| Cost component | Li-ion block (50 MW, 100 MWh) | Flow battery block (30 MW, 300 MWh) | Hybrid plant (combined) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery module (USD/kWh) | 150–200 | 80–120 | Blended ~130 |
| Balance of system (USD/kW) | 400–600 | 300–450 | Blended ~450 |
| Installed CAPEX (USD/kWh) | 250–350 | 150–200 | Blended ~190 |
| Annual O&M (% of CAPEX) | 1–2% | 0.5–1% | ~1.2% |
When stacking multiple revenue streams (e.g., 50% frequency response, 30% arbitrage, 20% capacity), hybrid plants can achieve LCOS in the 80–140 USD/MWh range, depending on market depth and contract structures. This is often lower than either technology alone because the flow battery absorbs longer-duration, lower-margin services while the Li-ion captures high-value, fast-response opportunities.
4. Control strategies and energy management systems
The success of a hybrid plant depends critically on the energy management system (EMS) and its control logic. Key design choices include:
- Priority-based dispatch: which asset responds first to a market signal or grid request?
- State-of-charge (SoC) targets: how are minimum and maximum SoC levels set for each block?
- Ramp rate coordination: how do the two technologies coordinate to meet grid ramp requirements?
- Degradation awareness: does the EMS actively minimize cycling on the Li-ion block to extend its life?
Operational insight: A well-tuned EMS can reduce equivalent full cycles on the Li-ion block by 20–40%, translating to 3–5 years of additional useful life and deferring a replacement capex event worth tens of millions of dollars.
4.1 Typical control hierarchy
A common control structure prioritizes the Li-ion block for fast, high-value services and uses the flow battery for longer-duration, lower-margin services:
- Tier 1 (Li-ion primary): Frequency response, intraday arbitrage, ramp support (milliseconds to minutes).
- Tier 2 (Flow battery primary): Day-ahead arbitrage, capacity provision, congestion relief (hours).
- Tier 3 (Hybrid coordination): When both assets are needed to meet a constraint (e.g., multi-hour ramp or sustained discharge).
5. Case studies: hybrid plants in operation and development
Several projects worldwide are demonstrating hybrid storage concepts at utility and industrial scales:
- Europe (Germany, UK): Hybrid Li-ion + vanadium flow projects in the 10–50 MW range, often paired with renewable curtailment management.
- United States: Pilot projects combining Li-ion with iron-air or other long-duration technologies, often in deregulated markets with stacked revenue streams.
- Asia-Pacific: Growing interest in hybrid systems for grid stabilization and industrial load shifting, particularly in markets with high renewable penetration.
Model hybrid plant economics with Energy Solutions tools
Our hybrid storage optimization tools help developers and utilities evaluate different technology combinations, control strategies, and market participation models on a common LCOS and IRR basis.
6. Outlook to 2030: hybrid plants as the norm
As battery costs decline and grid operators demand more sophisticated storage portfolios, hybrid plants are likely to become the default architecture for new multi-hour storage projects. Key drivers include:
- Continued cost reductions in both Li-ion and long-duration technologies, making blended solutions economically attractive.
- Regulatory and market design evolution to better reward multi-service, multi-asset dispatch.
- Operational experience and standardization of EMS and control frameworks.
- Pressure to defer or avoid transmission and distribution upgrades through smarter, more flexible storage.
7. FAQ: common questions on hybrid storage plants
Why not just build a larger flow battery plant instead of a hybrid?
A larger flow battery plant would be slower to respond to fast grid events and would miss high-value frequency response and intraday arbitrage opportunities. A hybrid plant captures both the fast-response value (via Li-ion) and the long-duration value (via flow), often at lower total LCOS than either technology alone.
How much does the EMS cost, and is it a significant part of the project budget?
A capable EMS typically costs 1–3% of total project CAPEX. While not trivial, it is a small fraction of the overall investment and is essential to unlocking the full value of the hybrid architecture. Skimping on EMS sophistication can easily erase the economic benefits of the hybrid design.
Can hybrid plants participate in all the same markets as single-technology plants?
In principle, yes. However, market rules and settlement frameworks vary widely. Some markets explicitly reward multi-service dispatch and asset stacking; others do not. Developers should carefully review market rules and contract structures before committing to a hybrid design.
What happens if one block fails? Can the plant still operate?
Yes, a hybrid plant can operate with one block offline, though at reduced capacity and revenue. The redundancy and modularity of the hybrid design can actually improve overall project resilience compared to a single large battery block.
How do you handle the different degradation profiles of Li-ion and flow batteries?
The EMS tracks state-of-health (SoH) for both blocks and adjusts dispatch priorities as they age. In practice, the Li-ion block may need replacement after 10–15 years while the flow battery continues for 20+ years. Project financing and O&M contracts should explicitly account for this staggered replacement schedule.