In many cities, toilets and irrigation still flush with perfectly good drinking water. Greywater systems capture lightly used water from showers, baths, and bathroom sinks, clean it, and reuse it for toilet flushing, irrigation, or cooling towers. In 2026, falling treatment costs and higher water tariffs mean that well-designed systems can save 25-55% of potable water use in multi-family and hotel projects-while also cutting the energy required for water supply and wastewater treatment. At Energy Solutions, we've analyzed water and energy savings from 85+ greywater installations across different building types.
What You'll Learn
- What Counts as Greywater (and What Doesn-t)
- Common System Types and Use Cases
- Water & Energy Savings by Building Type
- Methodology: How We Estimated Savings
- Economics, Payback, and When It Makes Sense
- Case Studies: Apartments, Hotels & Campuses
- Global Perspective: Drought, Tariffs & Codes
- Design & Operations: What Makes Systems Perform
- Devil's Advocate: When Greywater Isn-t Worth It
- Outlook to 2030: From Niche to Standard Detail?
- FAQ: Design, Maintenance, and Regulation
What Counts as Greywater (and What Doesn-t)
Most codes draw a clear line between greywater (relatively low contamination) and blackwater (toilet and kitchen waste). Typical categories:
- Included: showers, bathtubs, bathroom sinks, sometimes laundry.
- Excluded: toilets, kitchen sinks, dishwashers, garbage disposals.
Common System Types and Use Cases
Greywater systems range from simple small tanks to fully automated treatment plants.
Typical Greywater System Types (2026)
| System Type | Scale | Example Use | Typical Uses for Treated Water |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple capture & storage | Single-family / small multi-unit | New villas, eco-homes | Garden irrigation, sub-surface drip |
| Packaged treatment unit | Multi-family, hotels | Mid-rise apartments, resorts | Toilet flushing, irrigation |
| Centralised building plant | Large mixed-use / campuses | Hospitals, universities | Toilets, cooling towers, landscaping |
Water & Energy Savings by Building Type
Water savings translate into direct utility bill reductions plus indirect energy savings from pumping and hot-water demand. The table below shows indicative ranges for well-designed systems.
Indicative Savings from Greywater Reuse (Selected Building Types)
| Building Type | Reuse Applications | Potable Water Reduction | Approx. Utility Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-family (mid-rise) | Toilets + irrigation | 25-40% | ~$18-$35 / unit / month |
| Hotel (urban) | Toilets + cooling tower make-up | 30-50% | ~$0.7-$1.5 / m- / month |
| Office (large campus) | Toilets + landscaping | 20-35% | ~$0.3-$0.8 / m- / month |
Typical Potable Water Reduction by Building Type
Methodology: How We Estimated Savings
The savings ranges in this guide are based on a mix of measured data from real projects and design calculations for typical building archetypes. For comparability, we assumed steady occupancy levels and normalised results to annual averages.
In simple terms, the steps look like this:
- Estimate the daily volume of greywater from showers, baths, and bathroom basins based on fixtures and occupancy.
- Estimate non-potable demand that can accept treated greywater (toilet flushing, irrigation, cooling tower make-up) without compromising health regulations.
- Apply local water and sewer tariffs, including any fixed charges, to translate volume reductions into bill savings.
Because user behaviour and occupancy vary, individual projects will see results above or below the mid-range values shown. The robust conclusion is not that every multi-family project saves a specific dollar amount, but that dense, well-designed systems in water-stressed cities consistently show materially lower potable demand than identical buildings without reuse.
Economics, Payback, and When It Makes Sense
Economics depend on local water/sewer tariffs, building size, and whether reuse is planned from day one. The example below shows simplified payback ranges for mid-rise multi-family projects.
Simplified Payback vs Water Tariff (Multi-Family Example)
Greywater systems are most attractive when:
- Water and sewer tariffs are high or expected to rise.
- The project is dense (many fixtures) and can centralise treatment.
- Local codes clearly allow reuse and provide design guidance.
Case Studies: Apartments, Hotels & Campuses
Real-world projects highlight when greywater moves from -nice idea- to solid business case:
- Urban apartment block: a 120-unit building with shared greywater plant cut potable use for toilet flushing and irrigation by ~35%, with a simple payback of 9-11 years at current tariffs.
- Business hotel: high occupancy and constant laundry/hot-water loads created enough greywater to supply toilets and cooling-tower make-up, driving 30-45% potable savings and 5-8 year payback.
- University campus: centralised reuse plant serving multiple dorms and teaching blocks reached very low unit costs thanks to scale, while earning points in green-building certifications.
Global Perspective: Drought, Tariffs & Codes
Adoption is closely tied to water stress and regulation:
- Water-stressed regions in parts of the Middle East, Australia, and western North America see the highest installation rates, driven by high tariffs and escalating sewer charges.
- Europe and East Asia: Some major cities combine water conservation policies with green building requirements that make greywater systems nearly standard in new hotels and institutional complexes.
- Emerging markets: In many cities with limited infrastructure, the focus on expanding water and sewer networks takes precedence, delaying advanced reuse solutions.
Design & Operations: What Makes Systems Perform
Two greywater plants with similar equipment can perform very differently over time. The most successful installations share a few traits:
- Simple, robust layouts: Clear separation between greywater and blackwater lines, with easy access for inspection and maintenance.
- Right-sized storage: Tanks large enough to buffer daily patterns, but not so large that water stagnates and treatment becomes harder.
- Integrated controls: Level sensors and pumps tied into the building management system so that operators can see flows and respond to alarms quickly.
- Planned O&M routines: Filter cleaning, pump checks, and water-quality testing scheduled and tracked alongside HVAC and other plant tasks.
Where these basics are missing, systems often underperform: tanks are bypassed, treatment units are left offline, or operators quietly revert to full potable supply. Good engineering and operations planning matter as much as the choice of membrane, filter, or disinfection technology.
Devil's Advocate: When Greywater Isn-t Worth It
Not every building is a good candidate for greywater, even in environmentally conscious cities:
- Single-family homes with low consumption may see payback periods longer than 20 years.
- Buildings that lack equipment room space or additional pipe shafts can face prohibitively high construction costs.
- Low water and sewer tariffs undermine the financial return, even with significant volume savings.
In these cases, water-efficient fixtures, leak repairs, or sub-metering to change user behaviour may be more cost-effective than building a full greywater plant.
Outlook to 2030: From Niche to Standard Detail?
By 2030, greywater systems are likely to become:
- Standard detail in institutional buildings and hotels in cities with high tariffs or chronic water shortage.
- Recommended option for large residential complexes targeting green building certifications or water performance contracts.
- Less common in individual homes, unless water prices rise rapidly or new regulatory requirements are imposed.
For developers thinking about building lifecycles longer than 20 years, greywater becomes an important tool for managing future scarcity and tariff risks.
As more cities introduce water-neutral or circular-water goals, on-site reuse is likely to move from -optional extra- to a mainstream design question alongside energy modelling. Early adopters will gain valuable experience with design standards, operations, and tenant communication that later projects will be able to copy rather than reinvent.