Executive Summary
"Phantom drain"—the slow loss of charge when an EV is parked—has gone from forum myth to quantified operational cost
for fleets and households. Modern EVs are always-on computers with telematics, security, and thermal management systems that sip
energy even when wheels are not turning. At
Energy Solutions,
we analyse real-world data from thousands of vehicles to benchmark standby losses by brand, software configuration, and climate.
- Across mixed brands and climates, we observe typical parked losses of 0.1–0.5 kWh per day for newer EVs in "sleep"
modes, and up to 1–3 kWh/day for vehicles with aggressive connectivity or frequent wake-ups.
- In cold climates, pre-conditioning, battery heating, and more frequent wake cycles can roughly double standby losses
in winter compared to mild weather.
- For retail drivers, phantom drain rarely moves the economics needle, but for **large fleets** the difference between good and bad
standby profiles can amount to tens of MWh per year and substantial electricity spend.
- Over-the-air (OTA) software updates since 2022 have reduced drain for several models by 20–50% in our datasets, mainly by
improving deep sleep and batching telemetry.
- By 2030, we expect OEMs to treat standby consumption as a key KPI, with regulators possibly requiring disclosure similar to
standby mode ratings for appliances.
What Is EV Phantom Drain and Where Does the Energy Go?
Phantom drain (also called vampire drain) is the loss of stored energy in an EV’s traction battery while the vehicle is
parked and not being driven. Unlike self-discharge in older chemistries, most modern drain is due to active systems:
- Telematics and connectivity – cellular modems, Wi‑Fi, and over-the-air update services.
- Security and sensing – alarm systems, proximity sensing, cameras, and sentry-like modes.
- BMS and thermal management – keeping the pack within safe temperatures and states of charge.
- 3rd-party apps and integrations – repeated wake-ups from smartphone apps, fleet platforms, or smart-home links.
In practice, OEMs offer a spectrum of behaviours:
- "Always connected" modes that prioritise convenience and instant app access.
- "Energy saving" or "deep sleep" modes that accept slower wake times in exchange for lower drain.
Typical Contributors to EV Standby Consumption
| Subsystem |
Typical Power Draw (W) |
Notes |
| Base electronics & BMS |
5–25 W |
Depends on sleep state and polling intervals. |
| Telematics & connectivity |
2–15 W |
Frequent wake-ups and constant LTE can dominate drain. |
| Security & cameras |
10–80 W (when active) |
Sentry/guard modes can be the single largest contributor. |
| Thermal conditioning |
Variable (bursty) |
Short bursts to avoid extremes in hot/cold storage. |
Benchmarks: Daily Parked Loss by Brand, Climate, and Settings
Using anonymised telematics from mixed fleets and opt-in consumer datasets (mostly 2023–2025), we estimate average daily energy
loss while parked under "normal" user behaviour. Table 2 below illustrates typical ranges by configuration. For units and measurement
context: standby/low-power consumption is typically characterised as average power (W) over time when loads fluctuate (e.g., IEC 62301
principles summarised by the U.S. Department of Energy: DOE).
Quick conversion: kWh/day ≈ (average W × 24) / 1000. Example: 20 W average ≈ 0.48 kWh/day; 80 W average ≈ 1.92 kWh/day.
Indicative Daily Phantom Drain (kWh/day) by Use Pattern
| Scenario |
Climate |
Typical Drain |
| Deep sleep, limited app polling |
Temperate |
0.1–0.3 kWh/day |
| Always-connected, frequent checks |
Temperate |
0.4–1.0 kWh/day |
| Security/camera mode enabled |
Urban, temperate |
1.0–2.5 kWh/day |
| Cold storage with battery heating |
Sub‑zero winters |
0.5–2.0 kWh/day (weather dependent) |
Illustrative Daily Phantom Drain by Scenario
Brand-to-brand differences are narrowing as OEMs tune software, but we still see 2–3× variation between best- and
worst-behaving configurations. OTA updates over the past three years have systematically reduced drain for some models.
Economic Analysis: Cost, Range Impact, and Fleet TCO
For an individual driver, phantom drain is often a range annoyance more than a bill shock. At $0.20/kWh, an extra
0.5 kWh/day amounts to roughly $36/year. For a fleet of 1,000 vehicles, the same behaviour can mean:
- 0.5 kWh/day/vehicle × 365 days × 1,000 vehicles ≈ 182,500 kWh/year.
- At $0.15–$0.25/kWh, that is $27k–$45k/year in electricity spend.
Illustrative Annual Phantom Drain Cost – 1,000‑Vehicle Fleet
| Average Drain (kWh/day) |
Annual Energy (MWh) |
Annual Cost @ $0.15/kWh |
Annual Cost @ $0.25/kWh |
| 0.3 |
~110 |
$16k |
$27k |
| 0.7 |
~256 |
$38k |
$64k |
| 1.5 |
~548 |
$82k |
$137k |
Fleet Phantom Drain Cost vs Average Daily Standby (1,000 EVs)
Beyond cost, phantom drain erodes usable range on departure. For example, an EV with a 60 kWh pack and 3 days of
high-drain parking (1.5 kWh/day) loses ~4.5 kWh—roughly 7–10% of usable capacity for many models. For airport parking
or remote depots, this matters.
Case Studies: Home Users, Corporate Fleets, and Car-Sharing
Case 1 – Airport Parking, High Drain Configuration
A mid-range EV left for 10 days at an airport with camera-based security mode continuously enabled lost ~18–20% SoC.
Owner telematics showed ~1.5–2.0 kWh/day consumption, mostly from cameras and connectivity. After software updates, enabling a dedicated
"long-term parking" mode cut losses roughly in half.
Case 2 – Corporate Sales Fleet
A European sales fleet (220 EVs) initially reported an average of 0.8 kWh/day of phantom drain due to frequent app polling
and legacy telematics. By reconfiguring fleet software to poll less often and enabling eco-sleep profiles, average drain dropped to
~0.35 kWh/day, saving roughly 40 MWh/year.
Case 3 – Free-Floating Car-Sharing
An urban car-sharing operator relies heavily on always-on connectivity and location tracking. Phantom drain sits toward the upper end of the
spectrum (~1.0–1.8 kWh/day), but is treated as a necessary cost of availability. The operator mitigates impacts by favouring
models with efficient telematics hardware and by staging fast top-ups during low-demand hours.
Global Perspective: Cold vs Hot Markets and Software Maturity
Climate and software maturity drive significant differences:
- Nordic markets: Battery heating and cabin preconditioning for parked vehicles can add substantial winter overhead.
Drivers are more likely to use scheduled preheat features, raising perceived drain.
- Hot markets: Vehicles parked in direct sun may trigger periodic thermal management to protect packs and electronics.
- Software maturity: Established EV brands have had more cycles to refine sleep logic; newer entrants sometimes ship
with aggressive logging and wake behaviour that is later tuned down.
Energy Solutions Insight
In our datasets, OTA updates between 2022 and 2025 reduced average phantom drain by 20–50% for some popular models without
hardware changes—demonstrating that software is now a major lever in EV standby efficiency.
Devil’s Advocate: When Phantom Drain Is a Feature, Not a Bug
Not all standby consumption is "waste". Some loads are delivering direct value:
- Security footage and incident logs can avoid far greater losses from vandalism or theft.
- Predictive diagnostics and continuous monitoring can reduce breakdowns and warranty costs.
- Remote climate control improves safety and comfort, especially for passengers and pets.
The objective is not to reach zero drain but to achieve **smart, configurable standby** where users and fleets can choose their
position on the comfort–security–efficiency trade-off.
Outlook to 2030: Smarter Sleep, Edge AI, and Regulations
We expect several trends to shape phantom drain over the rest of the decade:
- Smarter firmware – vehicles that learn typical usage patterns and dynamically tighten sleep when owners are away.
- On-device AI – better local event filtering for cameras and sensors to avoid waking systems unnecessarily.
- Regulatory pressure – possible requirements to disclose standby consumption in WLTP/EPA-style documentation.
- Standardised APIs – improved coordination between OEMs and third-party apps to avoid "polling wars" that burn energy.
Deployment Guide: Reducing Idle Loss in Real Fleets
For operators, tackling phantom drain is largely a software and behaviour problem. Practical steps include:
- Audit current drain by segmenting vehicles by model, firmware version, and typical parking duration.
- Engage with OEMs to enable fleet-optimised sleep profiles and adjust telematics polling intervals.
- Standardise driver guidance on when to enable or disable high-drain features like guard/sentry modes.
- Where possible, integrate smart charging so that long-parked vehicles maintain SoC within efficient bands.
- Monitor results and feed back into procurement criteria for future EV purchases.
Checklist: Low-Drain vs High-Drain Fleet Configuration
| Levers |
Low-Drain Setup |
High-Drain Setup |
| App polling |
Batched, few times per day |
Frequent wake-ups, continuous polling |
| Security mode |
Targeted, event-triggered |
Always-on cameras and sensors |
| Sleep profile |
Eco/deep sleep after idle timeout |
"Always connected" priority |
FAQ: Best Practices for Drivers and Fleet Managers
How much phantom drain is "normal" for a modern EV?
For most 2024–2026 models in temperate climates, 0.1–0.4 kWh/day with energy-saving modes enabled is typical.
Sustained losses above ~1 kWh/day without security modes or harsh weather merit investigation.
What should I do before leaving my EV parked for weeks?
Enable any available storage or deep-sleep mode, disable high-drain security features unless necessary, and park
with a comfortable SoC buffer (e.g., 60–80%). In very cold or hot climates, parking in covered or temperate locations can reduce
thermal-related losses.
Can third-party apps cause extra phantom drain?
Yes. Apps that poll vehicle APIs frequently can keep systems awake. Fleet managers should consolidate integrations where possible
and prefer platforms that support event-based or batched polling.
Does phantom drain harm battery health?
Small, steady draws are usually less of a concern than repeatedly cycling to very low SoC. The bigger risk is leaving an EV
parked for long periods at low SoC such that phantom drain pulls it toward 0% and deep discharge. Storage at moderate
SoC in eco-sleep modes is generally fine.
How can fleets incorporate standby efficiency into procurement?
Request standby consumption metrics from OEMs, include them in total cost of ownership models, and favour vehicles
that support granular sleep configuration and high-quality telematics APIs.