Cobalt-Free EV Batteries 2026: Mining Ethics, Supply Chains, and the Race Beyond Cobalt

By 2026, EV sales are set to exceed 20 million units per year, pulling global cobalt demand for batteries above 220,000 tonnes annually. Around 70% of mined cobalt still comes from the Democratic Republic of Congo, where 10-15% is estimated to involve artisanal, high-risk operations. At Energy Solutions, we track ESG and materials data across 40+ OEMs and 120 battery plants. This article quantifies how fast the industry is moving beyond cobalt-and what -ethical sourcing- really looks like in 2026.

What You'll Learn

Download Full Report (PDF)

Why Mining Ethics Matter in the EV Battery Boom

EVs cut tailpipe emissions to zero, but they shift environmental and social impact upstream into mining, refining, and manufacturing. Cobalt has become the focal point for NGOs, regulators, and investors because of its association with child labor, unsafe working conditions, and opaque intermediaries.

For OEMs and fleets, the risk is no longer only reputational. New EU and US rules introduce due diligence obligations, while asset managers screen portfolios on Scope 3 emissions and human rights exposure. Battery sourcing decisions now directly influence access to capital, subsidies, and tenders.

Energy Solutions Insight

In our 2025-2026 survey of 180 institutional investors, 63% said they would discount valuations for OEMs unable to evidence traceable, low-risk cobalt supply. Yet, 45% of fleet managers still do not request any mine-level data from their leasing partners. The transition to cobalt-light and cobalt-free chemistries is as much about data and governance as it is about materials science.

Inside the Cobalt Supply Chain in 2026

Cobalt moves through a long chain: artisanal and industrial mines ? traders ? refiners ? cathode producers ? cell makers ? pack assemblers ? OEM. Each step can either strengthen traceability-or introduce blind spots.

Global Cobalt Supply by Region and Risk Profile (2025 Estimates)

Source Region Share of Mined Cobalt Artisanal / Small-Scale Share ESG Risk Rating Key Notes
DRC (Industrial) ~55% < 3% Medium Large concession mines with varying ESG performance; some aligned with ICMM standards.
DRC (Artisanal) ~15% > 80% High High incidence of informal labor, weak oversight, and complex trader networks.
Indonesia & Philippines ~12% < 1% Medium Nickel-rich laterite ores; ESG focus on deforestation and tailings management.
Australia & Canada ~8% < 1% Low Highly regulated jurisdictions with stronger labor and environmental protections.
Other Regions ~10% 2-4% Medium Diverse mix of smaller producers; data quality often limited.

*Energy Solutions synthesis of public company reports, NGO datasets, and customs statistics for 2025.

Projected Cobalt Demand for EV Batteries: With vs. Without Material Thrifting

The Shift Beyond Cobalt: LFP, Manganese-Rich, and Sodium-Ion

Battery makers are reducing cobalt intensity in three main ways:

Cathode Chemistries Compared: Materials, Cost, and ESG Exposure (Indicative 2026)

Cathode Type Cobalt Content Typical Energy Density Cell Cost (2026, $/kWh) Relative ESG Risk
NMC 811 / NCA Low (< 5% by weight) High (240-280 Wh/kg) $80-95 Medium - cobalt exposure reduced but not eliminated; high nickel demand.
NMC 622 / 712 Moderate (5-12%) Mid-High (210-240 Wh/kg) $90-110 Medium-High - legacy chemistries still in mainstream fleets.
LFP None (0%) Mid (160-190 Wh/kg) $70-85 Low - no cobalt or nickel; ESG focus shifts to phosphate, iron, and processing emissions.
Manganese-rich (LNMO, LMFP) Very Low (< 3%) Mid-High (190-230 Wh/kg) $80-100 Medium - limited cobalt, but manganese mining and HF emissions under scrutiny.
Sodium-ion (Gen 1) None (0%) Low-Mid (120-160 Wh/kg) $55-75 Low - no cobalt or lithium; ESG focus on aluminum, graphite, and power mix.

Global Cathode Chemistry Mix: 2020 vs 2025 vs 2030 (Forecast)

ESG Metrics: Comparing Battery Chemistries

Moving away from cobalt does not automatically make a battery -clean-. ESG assessments need to consider climate impact (kg CO2e/kWh), water use, waste, and social risk at the mine and refining level.

Our internal scoring framework aggregates more than 40 indicators into a 0-100 index (100 = lowest risk). The chart below shows a simplified comparison across chemistries typical for 2026 production.

Relative ESG Risk Index by Chemistry (Higher = Better)

Policy, OEM Pledges, and Investor Pressure

Regulators are hard-coding mining ethics into market access:

In parallel, leading OEMs have announced:

Procurement Playbook: How to De-Risk Your Battery Supply

Corporate fleet managers and energy storage developers increasingly specify chemistry and ESG criteria in their tenders. Based on our client work, effective RFPs typically require:

  1. Full material breakdown by chemistry, including cobalt intensity (kg/kWh).
  2. Mine-to-cell traceability with digital certificates or blockchain-based tracking where available.
  3. ESG scorecards for each supplier, including third-party audits and remediation plans.
  4. Scenario analysis for switching to LFP or sodium-ion in future procurement rounds.

Quick Checklist for Buyers

If a supplier cannot answer basic questions on cobalt origin, chemistry mix, and ESG certifications in writing, treat that as a material risk signal, not a minor paperwork gap. In 2026, data-poor supply chains are a strategic liability.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are EVs still better for the climate if mining impacts are so high?

Yes. Even when you include mining and battery manufacturing, most EVs emit 50-70% less lifecycle CO2e than comparable combustion cars over 10 years of use-especially in grids that are decarbonising. The key is to continuously reduce upstream impacts through better chemistries, recycling, and cleaner power for refineries and gigafactories.

What does -cobalt-free- actually mean in EV batteries?

Strictly speaking, only chemistries like LFP and many sodium-ion cells are truly cobalt-free. High-nickel NMC or NCA packs are often described as -low-cobalt- rather than cobalt-free. When evaluating claims, always ask for chemistry type and cobalt intensity in kg/kWh rather than marketing labels.

How fast will major automakers move away from cobalt?

Most global OEMs target 40-60% of their battery volume in LFP or other low-/no-cobalt chemistries by 2030, especially in entry and mid-range models. High-performance and long-range vehicles will likely keep using low-cobalt high-nickel chemistries longer, but the average cobalt per vehicle is already trending down each model generation.

What can fleets and corporate buyers do today to improve mining ethics?

Large buyers have real leverage. You can specify cobalt-free or low-cobalt chemistries in tenders, require mine-level traceability, ask for third-party audit reports, and favour suppliers investing in recycling and closed-loop programmes. Transparent requirements communicated early in procurement cycles change how OEMs prioritise their supply chains.

Related Articles

What Really Happens When EV Batteries Are Recycled

Follow cobalt, nickel, and lithium from end-of-life packs back into new cells-and how recycling reshapes mining demand.

Read Analysis

Sodium-Ion Batteries: A Cheaper, Cobalt-Free Alternative

Cost, performance, and ESG profile of sodium-ion chemistries for short-range EVs and grid storage.

See Market Outlook

Tokenization & Blockchain for Traceable Energy Metals

How digital certificates and tokenized metals could make cobalt and nickel supply chains verifiable end-to-end.

Explore Use Cases