Blue Hydrogen Retrofits 2027: SMR Plants as Low-Hanging Fruit

Executive Summary

Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) currently supplies the majority of global hydrogen, predominantly for refining and ammonia production, with typical lifecycle emissions of 8–11 tCO₂ per tonne of H₂. Retrofitting existing SMR units with carbon capture systems is frequently described as "low-hanging fruit" for decarbonization. In reality, economics and abatement performance vary significantly by plant size, configuration, integration options and regional policy environment. At Energy Solutions, we examine where blue hydrogen retrofits truly deliver competitive abatement costs—and where they risk locking in suboptimal assets.

Download Full Blue Hydrogen SMR Retrofit Report (PDF)

What You'll Learn

Basics: SMR Hydrogen, Emissions and Retrofit Levers

Steam Methane Reforming converts natural gas and steam into hydrogen and CO₂ through reforming and shift reactions, typically followed by a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) unit to polish hydrogen purity. The main emissions levers are:

Retrofitting focuses on capturing process and, optionally, combustion CO₂, and on reducing energy use per unit of hydrogen through efficiency upgrades.

Capture Configurations: Process-Only vs Full-Facility

Two broad configurations dominate retrofit discussions:

  1. Process-only capture: CO₂ is captured from a relatively pure syngas stream, using solvents (e.g., amines) or physical separation technologies. Capture rates in this stream can exceed 90–95%, but overall plant capture is limited by remaining combustion emissions.
  2. Full-facility capture: Additional post-combustion capture units treat flue gases from reformer furnaces and boilers, targeting overall capture rates above 85–90% of total emissions.

Indicative Capture Configuration Comparison (Stylised 2027)

Configuration Share of Emissions Targeted Overall Capture Rate Relative Complexity
Process-Only Capture 60–70% 50–65% Moderate
Process + Partial Combustion Capture 80–90% 70–85% High
Process + Full Combustion Capture 90–100% 85–95% Very High

Indicative Capture Rate vs Added CAPEX

The chart below shows a stylised relationship between overall capture rate and relative CAPEX for different retrofit configurations.

Source: Energy Solutions SMR retrofit model (illustrative).

Benchmarks & Cost Data: CAPEX, Capture Rates and Penalties

Retrofits impose both capital and operating penalties: additional equipment, energy use and integration complexity. Benchmarks include:

Indicative CAPEX and Performance Benchmarks for SMR Retrofits

Plant Size Hydrogen Capacity Configuration Retrofit CAPEX Additional Energy Use
Small Industrial SMR 20–50 ktH₂/year Process-Only 70–150 million USD +10–18% energy per tH₂
Refinery SMR Complex 80–150 ktH₂/year Process-Only 120–250 million USD +8–15% energy per tH₂
Large Merchant Hydrogen Plant 150–300 ktH₂/year Process + Partial Combustion 250–500 million USD +15–25% energy per tH₂

Figures are stylised and exclude CO₂ transport and storage costs, which can add 10–40 USD/tCO₂ depending on distance, infrastructure and storage type.

Indicative Hydrogen Production Cost (LCOH) for Retrofit Scenarios

The bar chart below compares approximate levelised cost of hydrogen (LCOH) for a set of stylised cases.

Source: Energy Solutions hydrogen cost analysis (illustrative, 2027 inputs).

Economics: LCOH, Abatement Costs and Policy Sensitivities

Blue hydrogen retrofit economics sit at the intersection of natural gas prices, carbon policy and alternative hydrogen options (notably green hydrogen).

For a representative refinery SMR unit:

With explicit carbon pricing at 80–150 USD/tCO₂, retrofits can be more cost-effective than paying for emissions in many jurisdictions, especially when green hydrogen LCOH remains above 2.5–3.5 USD/kg in 2027–2030.

Case Studies: Refinery SMR and Merchant Hydrogen Plants

Case Study 1 – Refinery SMR Complex with Process-Only Capture

A large refinery operating three SMR trains with combined capacity of 120 ktH₂/year evaluates a process-only capture retrofit.

Under a carbon price of 100 USD/tCO₂, the project yields a simple payback of 7–10 years and significantly improves the refinery’s Scope 1 profile, with additional strategic value if low-carbon hydrogen is required by downstream customers.

Case Study 2 – Merchant Hydrogen Plant Targeting 90% Capture

A merchant hydrogen producer delivering to industrial customers pursues deep capture as part of long-term offtake contracts.

The project becomes attractive where long-term offtake contracts include carbon-cost pass-through or premium pricing for low-carbon hydrogen, especially in jurisdictions with strong industrial decarbonization mandates.

Indicative Abatement Cost vs Capture Rate for SMR Retrofits

The line chart below illustrates how abatement cost can rise at higher capture rates due to increasing complexity and energy penalty.

Source: Energy Solutions abatement cost curve for SMR retrofits (stylised).

Infrastructure Integration: CO₂ Transport, Storage and H₂ Markets

Blue hydrogen economics are highly sensitive to CO₂ transport and storage infrastructure:

On the hydrogen market side, retrofitted SMR plants may serve internal refinery demand, local industrial users or longer-term hydrogen networks. Contract structures (take-or-pay, indexed to gas and carbon prices) and certification schemes for low-carbon hydrogen will shape project bankability.

Devil's Advocate: Lock-in, Feedstock Risk and Competing Pathways

Blue hydrogen retrofits are not without controversy.

These risks suggest that blue hydrogen retrofits should be prioritised where plants are efficient, integrated into broader industrial clusters and aligned with a clear regional net-zero strategy, rather than as blanket solutions.

Outlook to 2030/2035: Blue Hydrogen in a Net-Zero Portfolio

By 2035, blue hydrogen from retrofitted SMR plants is likely to play a transitional role in many systems:

Implementation Guide: Screening Checklist for SMR Retrofits

For asset owners considering SMR retrofits, a disciplined screening process is essential.

  1. Plant suitability: Assess age, efficiency and remaining life of SMR units. Plants with <10–15 years remaining economic life are weaker candidates.
  2. Scale and utilisation: Prioritise high-capacity, baseload plants with high utilisation factors.
  3. CO₂ infrastructure: Map access to existing or planned CO₂ transport and storage, including indicative tariffs.
  4. Policy environment: Evaluate carbon prices, tax credits, contracts for difference and hydrogen certification schemes.
  5. Alternative options: Benchmark retrofit LCOH and abatement cost against green hydrogen and other decarbonization levers.
  6. Stakeholder alignment: Engage offtakers and regulators early to ensure long-term support and clarity on “low-carbon hydrogen” labelling.
Methodology note: All cost, capture rate and LCOH values in this article are stylised and indicative, based on public SMR/CCS data and Energy Solutions modelling. Project-specific feasibility studies are required to produce investment-grade numbers.

FAQ: Blue Hydrogen Retrofits for SMR Plants

What capture rate is typically targeted in first-wave SMR retrofits?

Many first-wave projects target overall capture rates of 50–70% by focusing on process CO₂ streams. Higher capture rates are technically possible but require capturing dilute flue gas CO₂, which increases CAPEX and energy use.

How do retrofit costs compare to new-build blue hydrogen plants?

Retrofits can benefit from existing infrastructure but face integration constraints. New-build plants can optimise layouts for capture from day one. In many cases, well-designed new-build blue hydrogen plants exhibit slightly lower abatement costs than complex retrofits, but retrofits have the advantage of leveraging sunk capital and existing offtake arrangements.

How important is upstream methane leakage in evaluating blue hydrogen?

Very important. High upstream methane leakage can significantly increase lifecycle emissions, undermining climate benefits relative to unabated natural gas use. Combining SMR retrofits with strong methane abatement along the gas supply chain is critical to ensure credible lifecycle performance.

Can retrofitted SMR plants be converted to green hydrogen in the future?

In principle, some downstream infrastructure (pipelines, storage, offtake networks) can serve both blue and green hydrogen. However, the SMR units themselves are unlikely to be repurposed; instead, they may be gradually displaced by electrolysers over time, with blue hydrogen acting as a bridge.

What financial structures support SMR retrofit bankability?

Common structures include long-term offtake agreements with low-carbon hydrogen price premia, contracts for difference on carbon price, tax credits for captured and stored CO₂, and participation in industrial decarbonization or cluster funding schemes. These mechanisms provide revenue certainty to cover higher CAPEX and OPEX.

How do retrofit projects interact with future hydrogen pipelines?

In clusters planning hydrogen pipeline networks, retrofitted SMR plants can act as early anchor suppliers, helping justify investment in shared infrastructure. Over time, additional green hydrogen sources can connect, allowing a gradual shift in the supply mix without stranding pipelines.

Are SMR retrofits aligned with 1.5 °C climate goals?

Alignment depends on capture rates, upstream methane performance, and the timeline for transitioning towards lower-carbon alternatives. Blue hydrogen can play a role in near- to medium-term decarbonization, but long-term compatibility with 1.5 °C pathways generally requires very high capture rates, low methane leakage and a plan for eventual phase-down of unabated gas use.

What typical project timelines should stakeholders expect?

From concept to operation, SMR retrofit projects commonly require 5–8 years, including feasibility studies, FEED, permitting, financing and construction. Alignment with refinery or industrial turnaround schedules can significantly influence timing and cost.